A retractable greenhouse rooftop system is probably the best option to consider since it is flexible and protects against cold climates with heavy snow loads.
Green roof and greenhouse differences.
Fiberglass panels are commonly used to cover greenhouses as they are durable lasting for up to 20 years.
1 2 in addition green roofs can reduce building energy use by 0 7 compared to conventional roofs reducing peak electricity demand and leading to an annual savings of 0 23 per square foot of the roof.
Newer minds have taken the rooftop greenhouse concept and built a business model for using the rooftop greenhouse not as a research center but as a commercial production greenhouse to supply the local market.
15 to 50 per square foot.
A 2006 study from the university of michigan compared the expected costs of conventional roofs with the cost of a 21 000 square foot green roof and found that over its lifetime the green roof.
They provide shade to the top of a building evapotranspiration.
8 to 20 per square foot.
Green roof temperatures can be 30 40 f lower than those of conventional roofs and can reduce city wide ambient temperatures by up to 5 f.
The plants in a green roof absorb water through their roots and then use surrounding heat from the air to evaporate the water while some roofs can reach temperatures of up to 90 f in the summertime these two features can allow.
For a conventional roof.
The whole green revolution shifted by the modern rooftop greenhouse results in endless benefits.
A 2006 study by the university of michigan comparing costs of conventional and green roofs showed that on average installing a green roof costs about 22 00 sq.
Green roofs reduce the temperature of the building and the surrounding air in multiple ways.